Side Effects in Internet-Based Interventions for Social Anxiety Disorder



Per Carlbring*, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Johanna Boettcher, Department of Clinical Psychology, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Germany, Berlin, Germany
Alexander Rozental, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Gerhard Andersson, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping, Sweden


Track: Research
Presentation Topic: Web 2.0 approaches for clinical practice, clinical research, quality monitoring
Presentation Type: Poster presentation
Submission Type: Single Presentation

Last modified: 2014-06-11
qrcode

If you are the presenter of this abstract (or if you cite this abstract in a talk or on a poster), please show the QR code in your slide or poster (QR code contains this URL).

Abstract


Background: Internet-based interventions are effective in the treatment of various mental disorders and have already been integrated in routine health care in some countries. Empirical data on potential negative effects of these interventions is lacking.

Objective: This study investigated side effects in an Internet-based treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD).

Methods: A total of 133 individuals diagnosed with SAD took part in an 11-week guided treatment. Side effects were assessed as open formatted questions after week 2 and at post-treatment after week 11. Answers were independently rated by two coders. In addition, rates of deterioration and non-response were calculated for primary social anxiety and secondary outcome measures (depression and quality of life).

Results: In total, 19 participants (14%) described unwanted negative events that they related to treatment. The emergence of new symptoms was the most commonly experienced side effect, followed by the deterioration of social anxiety symptoms and negative well-being. The large majority of the described side effects had a temporary but no enduring negative effect on participants’ well-being. At post-treatment, none of the participants reported deterioration on social anxiety measures and 0-7% deteriorated on secondary outcome measures. Non-response was frequent with 32-50% for social anxiety measures and 57-90% for secondary outcomes at post-assessment.

Conclusions: Results suggest that a small proportion of participants in Internet-based interventions experiences negative effects during treatment. Information about potential side effects should be integrated in patient education in the practice of Internet-based treatments.




Medicine 2.0® is happy to support and promote other conferences and workshops in this area. Contact us to produce, disseminate and promote your conference or workshop under this label and in this event series. In addition, we are always looking for hosts of future World Congresses. Medicine 2.0® is a registered trademark of JMIR Publications Inc., the leading academic ehealth publisher.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.